written by: Tegan Smith on August 29th, 2014
With PMI’s announcement of a new Business Analysis credential to be piloted at the end of this year, they have signaled a massive acknowledgement of the importance the BA’s role in the world of projects and project management.
At ASPE, we have always been aware of this critical relationship, but with PMI’s entry into this professional area the conversation takes on larger significance. The PMI-PBA is not just a general business analysis certification. PMI has stated that they are specifically interested in what Business Analysis signifies to their community – a worldwide group of project managers, program professionals, and others who perform project work. Some of these particulars are nuanced, and it can be hard to pinpoint exactly where PMI’s interest ends and the general Business Analysis profession picks up.
In this one-hour web seminar, The PMI-PBA Credential: Taking a Look from the PMP’s Point of View presented by Chris Knotts on August 26th, attendees examined what the PMI-PBA credential means to those with a PMP. Should we get the credential? What does this new significance of Business Analysis mean to existing PMP credential holders?
Missed this seminar? Download the slides and recording here.
written by: Tegan Smith on August 22nd, 2014
Regardless of industry, thousands of technology investments are made every day. Get a glimpse into how to use a business blueprint to organize your enterprise and to make the right technology decisions. Get a cursory view of the benefits, such as; navigating through the complexity of information, visibly exposing opportunities for improvement and ensuring a common understanding for quick decisions. Improve the way you capture, validate and communicate various stakeholder views by understanding what is out in the industry to help you in this effort.
Information covered in this webinar:
•Importance of having a business blueprint
•Ways to classify the information through the use of frameworks and methods
•Key tools for communicating the information (models and notations)
•Example use of automated tools to capture the information.
This one hour seminar, The Business Blueprint: Organizing your Chaos, was held on Monday, August 18th, 2014 by Gina Schwalm. Want to review the material? Download the slides and recording here!
written by: Traci Taylor on August 21st, 2014
ASPE President, David Mantica, completed the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge nominating team members of training partner, Global Knowledge. Erica Loring, Jenna Doss, Tamara Phillips, Bill Baer and Bob Baer, you have 24 hours!
written by: JT Moore on August 14th, 2014
The PMI Professional in Business Analysis certification was introduced in early 2014 by the Project Management Institute (PMI). Priding ourselves on helping real-world professionals develop their careers through training and certification, we have sent several of our instructors through the application and pilot exam process. What follows is a collection of ten tips from their personal experience.
Our hope is that these tips will help guide you in your preparation before the exam as there is a lot of material to cover. Please understand that the exam is a pilot at the time of this article, so it most certainly will change, evolve and improve.
In general, all PMI Professional in Business Analysis candidates need to constantly keep in mind that this exam was developed by PMI (THE Project Management Institute). In other words, the exam is going to approach business analysis from a project management perspective. Inputs, definitions, terminology, tools and outputs will, as much as possible, track to The Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (the PMBOK).
- Tracking and updating requirement status using traceability
Study both the “Plan Scope Management” and “Collect Requirements” processes in the PMBOK, especially as they relate to the Requirements Management Plan and the Requirements Traceability Matrix. Any reference to traceability in the reading list should be reviewed. Rationale should be per the reading list; terminology per the PMBOK.
- Acceptance Criteria
“Validate Scope” should be reviewed for user acceptance test information in the PMBOK. These references: The Software Requirements Memory Jogger and the Business Analysis Techniques: 72 Essential Tools For Success both contain the most information related to acceptance criteria. Search the reading list for other references to user acceptance as this topic is heavily stressed on the exam.
- Monitoring requirements and managing changes to requirement
This is another heavily stressed area. Specifically target those areas in the readings where change management is discussed. Look at the Integration Management knowledge area of the PMBOK.
- Validating test results
Despite the fact that most BAs do not consider testing to be one of their primary responsibilities, there are a number of questions concerning testing on the exam. The PMBOK is light in this area. As with many other exam topics, a deep dive in this area is not necessary. Familiarize yourself with a high to intermediate-level view of testing.
- Using quality assurance tools to analyze solution discrepancies
Many of the quality planning/quality assurance/quality control tools are on the exam. Know especially the figures, charts, and graphs from the Project Quality Management knowledge area, specifically the seven basic quality tools.
- Prioritization techniques
Spend some time familiarizing yourself with the names and purposes of the BA tools presented in the Business Analysis Techniques: 72 Essential Tools For Success. You do not need to know (at present) how to use them, only recognize them as appropriate or inappropriate when provided a project scenario. Be sure to know MoSCoW and Kano.
- Evaluating how well the solution meets the business case
The Business Case is an important aspect of the exam. Read the first sections of the PMBOK to understand how the business case figures into the project selection methodology. Also familiarize yourself with the “Develop Project Charter” process. Search through the reading list for other discussions regarding the business case.
- Identifying and analyzing stakeholders
Just about any BA reference book will have a large discussion of the tasks necessary to identify and analyze project stakeholders. Make sure you are using the PMBOK’s terminology, but choose a couple of the reading list books to give yourself a complete understanding of the subject, especially Software Requirements 2, The Software Requirements Memory Jogger, and Unearthing Business Requirements: Elicitation Tools and Techniques.
- Validating requirements with tools and techniques
Elements of validation to study include establishing the level of traceability necessary for requirements validation during the Planning process. Prototyping, document analysis, and demos are important requirement validation tools and techniques to review in order to ensure requirements completeness, as well as requirements alignment with the project goal, objectives, and business case.
- Decision-making techniques
There is not a section of the PMBOK that covers this area. Rather, it is spread out here and there throughout the standard. Specifically look at the various forms of decision making tools (unanimity, plurality, etc.) and check the reading list indexes for decision-making references. The exam does not probe much deeper than the identification of techniques and, perhaps, the pros and cons of each technique.
written by: Tegan Smith on August 8th, 2014
PMI (Project Management Institute) continues to meet the needs of Project and SDLC (Software / System Development Life Cycle) professionals by offering another specialty certification.
The industry knows how critical a working relationship between the BA and PM is for project success. Also it is well understood that smaller companies can only afford to have Project Managers yet still need strong business analysis work done. PMI has answered these needs by offering this new certification.
Pilot applications are being accepted through May 12, 2014.
This web seminar covered in depth the PMI-PBA handbook (costs and application requirements), the examination content outline and the reading/outside knowledge requirements. We saved you the time and energy of reading through the 70+ pages of documentation.
ASPE-SDLC promises to be at the fore-front of this critical designation and this is our first step in providing you the information, knowledge, and skills needed to achieve the designation
This one hour seminar, Introducing the New PMI-PBA (Professional in Business Analysis) Certification, was presented by David Mantica on Tuesday August 5, 2014.
Missed this seminar? Download the slides and recording to catch up!
written by: Tegan Smith on July 25th, 2014
Do you believe in the elusive “silver-lining” to every situation? If your answer is no, you’re most likely a pessimist. Pessimists are known to anticipate and expect undesirable outcomes. Wouldn’t this trait be great for a software tester whose job is to find out what’s wrong and hunt down the bugs within an application? Though one might think the answer is yes, there are three important reasons the answer should be resounding NO!
- Pessimists find things that are not there:
If you are looking at an app pessimistically it is easy to see so many pieces, glitches, and bugs that could induce problems. Yes, no app will ever be perfect and we would be crazy to think this is even possible. But this not so perfect mindset does not come easily to pessimistic software testers who might not be able to see past inevitable glitches. This can and will create a combative relationship between the developer and the tester.
- Pessimism could hinder ability to think clearly:
Ultimately, testers are hired to simulate use of software in order to find bugs. Going into the process of simulation with a pessimistic attitude could hinder the tester’s ability to think clearly and do the major task testers are assigned to do, which is find places that have the possibility of being improved. If you are always anticipating undesirable outcomes then you will always find the bad in what could be good.
- All talk the talk and no walk the walk:
Testers that discover problems within software or Apps need to be able to prove why it is a problem that needs to be fixed and how the fix will add value to the software. Developers want their testers to provide relevant and useful information in order to reproduce the problem that was found as well. Furthermore, pessimism is often a state of mind that does not come with substantial claims to back it up. If a tester thinks that the app is not going to work, then they better have some good reasons to back their claim up.
All in all, pessimism in the workplace can be a disease that is hard to cure, especially in software testing. As a rule of thumb, it is always better to look at things with the mindset of the “glass half full” instead of empty. Testers should approach situations with a more optimistic point of view in order to accept that no software is ever going to glitch free. Testers, look at your job positively and one can expect positive results in return.